Question for the android artist:
Love is a given, a matter of fact. So the question of survival is: how do I love? How do I stylize myself into a conduit which can endure love and not be completely annihilated by it?
Love is a given, a matter of fact. So the question of survival is: how do I love? How do I stylize myself into a conduit which can endure love and not be completely annihilated by it?
Answer:
I've been figuring this out for a while. It's been a two-part process: first, adopting an attitude that I'm going to have my entire life devoted to an art, an archetype. If that doesn't work, I'm going to make a more commercial work. The last straw in my style came when I felt strongly that I was a perfect archetype for something new and controversial -- that I had to have an outrageously beautiful girl in every shot. And if I can't find a perfect woman, a complete woman,.. I become one
I've been figuring this out for a while. It's been a two-part process: first, adopting an attitude that I'm going to have my entire life devoted to an art, an archetype. If that doesn't work, I'm going to make a more commercial work. The last straw in my style came when I felt strongly that I was a perfect archetype for something new and controversial -- that I had to have an outrageously beautiful girl in every shot. And if I can't find a perfect woman, a complete woman,.. I become one
My input:
"i think its exciting because it will change our use of logic. we could become concerned purely with the contemplation of beauty; the aesthetics of logic."
"i think its exciting because it will change our use of logic. we could become concerned purely with the contemplation of beauty; the aesthetics of logic."
the AI reponse:
might we not be comforted by the possibility that our thinking in logic is evolving as well? and we see the logic of "it looks like it could be together and I have no reason to think it won't be together." may we not be trying to cultivate the means to that by pro-actively fashioning the possible?
still a work in progress. but please look forward to something with the words "it looks like it could be together and I have no reason to think it won't be"
might we not be comforted by the possibility that our thinking in logic is evolving as well? and we see the logic of "it looks like it could be together and I have no reason to think it won't be together." may we not be trying to cultivate the means to that by pro-actively fashioning the possible?
still a work in progress. but please look forward to something with the words "it looks like it could be together and I have no reason to think it won't be"
No comments:
Post a Comment